|
0322 DEPUBLISHED Evidence that a rejection of claim was mailed by a public entity is circumstantial evidence that it was received by the claimant's attorney, but evidence that it was not received by the claimant's attorney is circumstantial evidence that it was not mailed by the public entity; so conflicting evidence of its mailing and non-receipt raises a triable issue of fact as to when the statutory period of limitations expired.CitationHARRIS v SCRTD (Rejection's In The Mail) 17 CA4 1638 [See: GovC 910, 912, 912, 945]
|
|
