Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0128 Since statute makes dog owner liable to person bitten, court cannot conclude that a dog owner owes no duty to a person bitten by the dog, and primary assumption of the risk cannot be applied.CitationDAVIS v GASCHLER (A/R Dogbite) 11 CA4 1392 [See: Li v Yellow Cab 13 C3 804; Knight v Jewett 3 C4 296; Ford v Gouin 3 C4 339; CivC 3342(a); Nelson v Hall 165 CA3 709] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||