Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0196 Unless insurance company employee allegedly terminated for refusing to inflate reserves can show that inflating reserves is specifically prohibited by statute, he may not maintain a tort action for termination in violation of public policy.CitationSEQUOIA v SUPERIOR COURT (Inflate Reserves) 13 CA4 1472 [See: Tameny v ARCO 27 C3 167; Foley v Interactive 47 C3 654; Gantt v Sentry 1 C4 1083] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||