Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0104 REVIEW GRANTED A pharmacist filling a prescription for a nine month old child owes the child's parent a duty to act reasonably to protect the parent against emotional distress that might result from improperly filling the prescription or providing directions for its use.CitationHUGGINS v LONGS (Wrong Dose) 11 CA4 550 [See: Dillon v Legg 68 C2 728; Ochoa v SuperCt 39 C3 159; Thing v La Chusa 48 C3 644; Molien v Kaiser 27 C3 916; Marlene F v Affiliated 48 C3 583] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||