|
1608 Under Code of Civil Procedure § 340.6, a client's cause of action against an attorney accrued one year after hiring new counsel and not one year after losing the underlying suit because the client first suffered injury from malpractice upon having to pay new counsel to file the underlying suit, and the cause of action against the attorney did not toll under the continuing representation exception of Code of Civil Procedure § 340.6(a)(2) because the attorney did not continue to advise the client after the client hired new counsel. CitationTRUONG v GLASSER (Malpractice Limitations) 181 CA4 102 [See CCP §340.6; Worton v Worton, 234 CA3 1638; Adams v Paul 26 CA4 861, T/AT 08/1994]1608 Under Code of Civil Procedure § 340.6, a client's cause of action against an attorney accrued one year after hiring new counsel and not one year after losing the underlying suit because the client first suffered injury from malpractice upon having to pay new counsel to file the underlying suit, and the cause of action against the attorney did not toll under the continuing representation exception of Code of Civil Procedure § 340.6(a)(2) because the attorney did not continue to advise the client after the client hired new counsel. CitationTRUONG v GLASSER (Malpractice Limitations) 181 CA4 102 [See CCP §340.6; Worton v Worton, 234 CA3 1638; Adams v Paul 26 CA4 861, T/AT 08/1994]
|
|
