- Home
- Bios
- Try Us Free
- Subscribe
- Case Library
- CA Evidence
Discovery
Civ-Pro - Torts
- SLAPPS
- Text Summaries
- Search
- Support
Case Summary |
|
0052 DEPUBLISHED A policy provision requiring disputes regarding fee of Cumis Counsel to be submitted to arbitration does not require arbitration of dispute regarding necessity for Cumis Counsel.CitationCALLAHAN v INDUSTRIAL 9 CA4 1140 and TRUCK v DYNAMIC 9 CA4 1147 (Cumis Counsel Arbitration) [See: SD Fed Credit Union v Cumis 162 CA3 358; CivC 2860; USF&G v SuperCt 204 CA3 1513] |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||