Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0001 Jury instructions that correctly defined design defect overcame any error resulting from use of special verdict form in which question asked was not completely consistent with correct definition.CitationNEAL v MONTGOMERY (Defective Verdict Form) 7 CA4 1194 [See: Greenman v Yuba Power Products 59 C2 57; Barker v Lull Engineering Co. 20 C3 413; Campbell v General Motors Corp. 32 C3 112; Bernal v Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corp. 221 CA3 1326; BAJI (special verdict form) 16.11] |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||